Does Class Warfare Influence Slut-Shaming?

Hayley Matthews

Written by: Hayley Matthews

Hayley Matthews

Hayley has over 10 years of experience overseeing content strategy, social media engagement, and article opportunities. She has also written hundreds of informational and entertaining blog posts. Her work has appeared in numerous publications, including Bustle, Cosmo, the Huffington Post, AskMen, and Entrepreneur. When she's not writing about dating news, relationship advice, or her fantasy love affair with Leonardo DiCaprio, she enjoys listening to The Beatles, watching Harry Potter reruns, and drinking IPAs.

See full bio »

Edited by: Lillian Castro

Lillian Castro

Lillian Guevara-Castro brings more than 30 years of journalism experience to ensure DatingAdvice articles have been edited for overall clarity, accuracy, and reader engagement. She has worked at The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, The Gwinnett Daily News, and The Gainesville Sun covering lifestyle topics.

Discuss This! Discuss This!
Advertiser Disclosure

Slut-shaming may actually have more to do with social standing than sexual promiscuity, at least according to a new study.

Sociologists from the University of Michigan and the University of California at Merced found the practice of judging a woman’s worth via her sex life, or flatly calling out perceived “slutty” behavior, is more related to class lines than anything else.

From the beginning

Researchers recruited 53 female college students for their research, seeking their opinions on partying, sexuality and friendship.

They found when women described slutty behavior, they were more often referring to social standing or class rather than actual sex promiscuity.

Additionally, researchers discovered wealthier women were not judged by the same sexual standards as others. They found affluent women could engage in more slutty sexual behavior than those further down the socioeconomic scale without being labeled as such.

Elizabeth Armstrong

Elizabeth Armstrong
University of Michigan

Sociology professor Elizabeth Armstrong, of the University of Michigan, is one of the study’s authors. She said when affluent women ridicule others through slut-shaming, they may be displaying some territorial behavior.

“By engaging in slut-shaming — the practice of maligning women for presumed sexual activity — women at the top create more space for their own sexual experimentation, at the cost of women at the bottom of social hierarchies,” she said.

Through the research, the authors hope to bring more attention to slut-shaming as another clear form of bullying.

“In a few recent cases, slut-shaming has played a role in the suicides of girls and young women,” Armstrong said. “We hope that our findings are constructively used in campaigns against bullying.”

“By slut-shaming, women create space

for their own sexual experimentation.

One of the clearest indicators – sororities

According to the study, sororities may have something to do with slut-shaming. Of the subjects, the 23 who were members of a sorority also had upper-middle to upper-class backgrounds.

Through interviews, researchers determined these more affluent women tend to see themselves as displaying femininity with class, while the same behavior from someone less affluent would be seen as “trashy” or without class.

Similarly, less affluent women viewed the materialism displayed by affluent friends as “kinda whorish.”

One early finding that had the authors stumped would ultimately lead them to their conclusions.

They were puzzled as to why some women who engaged in less sexual activity were somehow more likely to be publicly labeled as a slut for it.

“This finding made little sense until we realized that college women also used the term as a way to police class boundaries,” Armstrong said.

The results appeared in the journal Social Psychology Quarterly.

Advertiser Disclosure

DatingAdvice.com is a free online resource that offers valuable content and comparison services to users. To keep this resource 100% free, we receive compensation from many of the offers listed on the site. Along with key review factors, this compensation may impact how and where products appear across the site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). DatingAdvice.com does not include the entire universe of available offers. Editorial opinions expressed on the site are strictly our own and are not provided, endorsed, or approved by advertisers.

Our Editorial Review Policy

Our site is committed to publishing independent, accurate content guided by strict editorial guidelines. Before articles and reviews are published on our site, they undergo a thorough review process performed by a team of independent editors and subject-matter experts to ensure the content’s accuracy, timeliness, and impartiality. Our editorial team is separate and independent of our site’s advertisers, and the opinions they express on our site are their own. To read more about our team members and their editorial backgrounds, please visit our site’s About page.